There's actually not 1 seriously great image cataloguing program out there. I need a replacement.I'd agree. It's a 32-bit application, which soon won't run on the latest Mac OS. PhaseOne just emailed me to inform me that they are ceasing development of Media Pro SE, the Mac OS Digital Asset Management software that I've used to catalogue and find my photos and videos since 2004 when it was iView Media Pro.
![]() Iview Media Pro Trial Version MacFind great deals on eBay for iview media pro. IView Media is a useful, trial version Mac. IView Media latest version: The visual database for all your media files.So we add metadata but can't use it as a search tool. And slower yet to do searches (if you think Portfolio is bad, bridge/lightroom are way slower and more expensive. We use bridge/lightroom for processing raw images but even that is as slow as portfolio to add/view data.Speed hasn't been an issue with us and we run 1 catalog with over 20,000 images on a PC and another with 7,000 images on mac. It can embed and export metadata into images which is awesome and simple. Or save with a Capture One version thats just for Fujifilm, Sony or Nikon cameras.iView Media is a useful, trial version Mac software, being part of the category Design & Photography with subcategory Photo Albums & Viewers.There are a lot of other wanna be image programs but they are viewers more than anything.Portfolio is more like a library catalogue (which is clunky compared to modern times) but EXTREMELY powerful cataloguing program. Capture One Pro lets you edit files from all major camera brands. There’s even an easy Lightroom Importer for making a smooth switch between software. Ba ii plus emulator macEspecially when you consider that this is supposed to be an expensive DAM program. Now I have a Mac, and am trying out version 8 with latest updates.But this software has become a nightmare, especially in view of the newer Bridge and Lightroom which do a better job.Keywording is a disaster. Shame they haven't kept up to date with the user's needs.In short: STAY AWAY FROM Extensis Portfolio.I've been using Portfolio since version 7, on PC. That is crazy in a pro photo program! It is also for the serious/pro cataloguers who love it, but for photographers it's too time consuming for them or they don't understand the power of the fields. Furthermore the products they sell you will be deficient, and when they do get around to delivering the promised features, they will force you to pay more money for what you already bought.We would like to thank everyone who has posted constructive criticism on MacUpdate about Portfolio.A number of the comments in this list originate from many years back, and many of the issues listed have been fixed long ago. I'm so disappointed with the money I spent on this bloated piece of junk.For years now extensis has been selling crappy vaporware and I, for one, am sick of it!Step 1: Make a lot of grand sounding promises.Step 2: deliver about 80% of what the customer pays for.Step 3: Wait 6 months, roll out the promised vaporware and charge a full upgrade for the code already sold to the customer in step 1.Step 4: Deliver product that doesn't even really work.Case in point: We are on our fourth generation of the Portfolio Family of products and the main feature that I sold this crap to my bosses with, (cross platform asset server) still, to this day, does not work!My professional recommendation is to avoid all extensis products as they are primarily a marketing/profit driven company that will not provide a stable, functioning product. It was once useful when it had less competition, but today there simply is no need for a single user to get Extensis Portfolio. I keep sending in the crash reports to Extensis, but never get any feedback.Cannot rotate an original unless it is a jpeg.Does not integrate well with Bridge or Lightroom.Did I mention that keywording REALLY sucks and it is outrageously expensive for what it is?Do your self a favour and do not buy it. Give it a few tasks to handle and it will hang and crash.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMichael ArchivesCategories |